Click Here to Go to the Ashbrook Center's Homepage

Subscribe to Our Email Update
 
SEARCH
 

Home



Support the Ashbrook Center




No Left Turns:
The Ashbrook
Center Blog




  Ashbrook
Podcasts


Podcast Index

What's a Podcast?

Peter Schramm's "You Americans"

Ashbrook Events

Teaching American History




Ashbrook Scholar Program



Social Studies
Teacher Seminars






Congressional Academy for American History and Civics





Presidential Academy for American History and Civics





Master of American History and Government





American Speeches, Letters, and Documents
On-Line Library






Constitutional
Convention


Federalist-
Antifederalist
Debate


Ratification of
the Constitution


Founding
Political Parties




Ashbrook 
Columnists 

Robert Alt

Andrew E. Busch

John C. Eastman

Christopher Flannery

David Forte

Patrick J. Garrity

Steven Hayward

Joseph Knippenberg

Terrence O. Moore

Lucas Morel

Mackubin T. Owens

Peter W. Schramm

David Tucker

John Zvesper




Calendar of Events



Subscribe to Our
E-Mail Update





Book of the Week:
The New Vichy Syndrome: Why European Intellectuals Surrender to Barbarism
by Theodore Dalrymple




Book of the Week Archive



Vindicating The
Founders.com




Classics of Strategy and Diplomacy



Suggested Articles



Who Was
John Ashbrook?




Other Sites of Interest

Blonde and Manly
Res Publica, v17n1
August 2009

by: Caitlin Poling


My life has been fraught with elusive relationships. Thus far, Prince Charming has yet to sweep me off my feet. Distance, character differences, arguments—you name it—have all seemed reasonable explanations for the severing of ties with boyfriends. After my most recent breakup, these reasons seem to have lost all gravity in the matter. Recognition dawns that perhaps the problem lies within me. I am just too manly.

Upon reading and studying Harvey C. Mansfield’s book Manliness, I have come to an interesting conclusion. I am indeed manly. Do not let the curls, pearls, high heels, and blonde hair fool you. The manly disposition of the soul is applicable to many—Dr. Schramm, Margaret Thatcher, and myself to name a few. According to Mansfield, "manliness is not mere aggression; it is aggression that develops an assertion, a cause it espouses" (Mansfield, 49). The manly man wants to seek importance in life and seeks recognition from others.

This definition most appropriately applies to me. I affirm my position, know what I want, and am not afraid to chase my dreams and goals. I crave adventure and change with this quality making me a bit nomadic. I have not spent more than four consecutive months in the same place since my freshman year in college. Observing that I moved from Ashland, Ohio to Washington, D.C. to France within a period of seven months to learn and experience more displays this trait quite well. Thinking upon the matter, I realize these personality nuances might make it difficult to be with me. Manliness implies a certain level of selfishness in its definition. To assert oneself and disregard risk without regard to others in a situation is often seen as a selfish act. To travel from one continent to another and yet expect someone to wait for you could be considered selfish, I suppose. But what happened to sacrificing and waiting for love? He promised he could.

The day before we broke up, my boyfriend told me something that came as a surprise. "You wear the pants in this relationship," he said, "I never have." Sure, I realize that I can be stubborn. I can be selfish. I can make unreasonable demands. But what girl doesn’t do the same at one time or another? I never thought that I was the dominating force in the relationship. The next day he broke up with me, citing distance and "a lot of little things that built up" as reasons for the split. I didn’t think that the fact that I tend to take charge made me a poor match. Or the fact that I was in France should end something that I thought was going to last forever. After a string of failed relationships, I thought this was it—he was "the one," and this was going to work. It turned out, I was wrong. So there I was left: manly and alone, again. Manly assertiveness is not capable of sustaining itself. As Mansfield says, it cannot stand alone.

A manly person… needs the realism of those who know human weakness. Families and politics are associations that bring men and women together and make them mutually appreciative. (Mansfield, 79)

If this is true, what happens to the manly woman? In a relationship, manly and womanly balance each other to provide harmony. Manliness is not self-sufficient; it depends upon others to recognize and support it. Being a manly woman, am I required to pair up with a womanly man to provide this balance? Am I destined to be like Blondie (how ironic), and have a "bumbling husband… manly only when tackling his hero sandwich" (Mansfield, 10)? Granted a manly person cannot detest the unmanly, but it is definitely unappealing. Societal norms and expectations draw the manly woman to desire a manly man. However, such a pairing tends to be incompatible. A manly woman needs the unmanly to provide a balance, a fact that can be difficult to accept.

According to Aristotle, it is not possible to have two manly people in the household, or in a relationship. The perfection of the sexes is realized when they are together. This is not necessarily restrained by sex as the physical, anatomical definition. The soul or personality is what matters most in this statement. Manliness does not reveal itself only among males, but often among females. A woman can have a manly soul. The opposite is possible as well. The souls must fit together properly in a relationship. One must be male and the other female. In the household, one asserts, and one recognizes and supports. One acquires and asserts, the other guards the acquired. There is something about the sexes, both physically and spiritually, that must compliment one another in order to function properly and to perfect themselves. Just because aman and a woman are anatomically compatible does not mean that they will be able to form a friendship according to nature. This friendship is necessary for household rule, or even to maintain a household. The souls must be compatible as well. One must be manly, and the other must be womanly. Pairing up with an equally manly personality could prove volatile.

Despite this understanding, I still possess womanly expectations of love and relationships. When turning points are reached, at the end of college for example, and decisions are to be made in a relationship of who will follow the other and who will sacrifice what, I am torn between cultural norms and my manly disposition. Society tells me that the woman must place her partner above her plans. She must follow him because eventually, he will acquire for her. My manly disposition drives me to expect the opposite. When faced with this circumstance, I was troubled. For the first time in my life, I told someone "I don’t care about my plans; I’ll go where you go." Familiar with my personality and character, he rejected my proposition. Part of me wanted to follow him, to sacrifice anything to make true love work. My manly nature had a hard time accepting that. In the end, I chose my own path—which could have been the last straw in driving him away.

Now, I could conclude by saying that "someday my prince will come," and that true love will arrive, as we all like to believe in fairytales. But that wouldn’t exactly be manly, would it? Instead, I will continue to forge my own path. I will continue to be what I have recognized myself to be: blonde and manly.

Caitlin Poling is a senior from Grosse Ile, Michigan, majoring in Political Science, International Studies, and French.



 


Printer-Friendly Version

Upcoming Events

Sidney Milkis on Theodore Roosevelt
Friday, March 19

Peter W. Schramm, John Moser on Calvin Coolidge
Friday, April 16

Mitt Romney
Friday, April 30


Recent Publications


Tom Hanks and The Pacific by Mackubin T. Owens

Our Lyceum by Peter W. Schramm

Delegitimizing the Roberts Court by David Marion

Stop the War on Oil and Gas by Mackubin T. Owens

Homosexuals in the Military by Mackubin T. Owens

House Republicans Revive Obama by Ken Thomas

What a Difference a Year Makes by Andrew E. Busch

That Sinking Feeling by Andrew E. Busch

Do We Have the Will to Win? by Mackubin T. Owens

After Reagan: Five Challenges for 21st Century Conservatives by Steven Hayward

Discovering the American Mind by Peter W. Schramm

Giving Thanks in Troubled Times by Joseph Knippenberg

Progressive Bigotry and Natural Law by Richard Adams

Advisers, Not Advocates by Mackubin T. Owens

Conservative Malaise? by Julie Ponzi


Audio Archive


James Leach on Civility (2010)

Michael Burlingame on Abraham Lincoln (2010)

Mary Taylor on Ohio (2010)

John Kasich on the Future of Ohio (2009)

John Moser on Captain America (2009)

Steven Hayward on Ronald Reagan (2009)

Tim Timken on Private Enterprise (2009)

Sally Pipes on Health Care Reform (2009)

Colleen Sheehan on James Madison (2009)

Conference on the Presidency and the Courts featuring President George W. Bush (2008)

Jeb Bush on America’s Promise (2008)

Harry V. Jaffa on the Lincoln-Douglas Debates (2007)

Glenn Beck on Militant Islam (2006)

Lamar Alexander on Education (2006)

Karl Rove on Conservatism (2005)

James McPherson on the Battle of Antietam (2005)

David Hackett Fischer on Liberty and Freedom (2004)

William Bennett on the Politics of War (2004)

Edwin Meese on Homeland Security (2003)

Barbara Bush on CSPAN (2003)

Victor Davis Hanson on Terrorism (2003)

Benjamin Netanyahu on Attaining Peace (2002)

Clarence Thomas on the Supreme Court (1999)

Margaret Thatcher on Ronald Reagan and Freedom (1993)

Lynne V. Cheney on Academic Freedom (1992)

Dick Cheney on American Foreign Policy (1991)

Ronald Reagan on John Ashbrook (1983)

  Real Logo
Visit our archive of over 200 other Ashbrook speeches at
audio.ashbrook.org or subscribe to our
Events Podcast.








ASHBROOK SCHOLAR PROGRAM | MASTER OF AMERICAN HISTORY AND GOVERNMENT |
PUBLICATIONS | EVENTS | PODCASTS | NO LEFT TURNS BLOG | AUDIO ARCHIVE | DONATE | ABOUT US

 

Ashbrook Scholar Program:  Home | Apply Online | Request More Information | Course of Study | Faculty | Speakers |
Why Study History or Political Science? | Internship Opportunities | Student Publications | Financial Assistance | FAQ | Contact Us

Master of American History and Government:  Home | About | Admission | Schedule of Courses | Course Registration | Tuition | Faculty | Request More Information

TeachingAmericanHistory.org:  Home | Saturday Seminars | Summer Institutes | Partner on a Teaching American History Grant | Historical Documents Library | Audio Lectures and Discussions | Constitutional Convention | Ratification of the Constitution

Presidential Academy for American History and Civics:  Home | About the Program | Documents and Texts | Faculty | Itinerary | Application

Congressional Academy for American History and Civics:  Home | About the Program | Documents and Texts | Faculty | Itinerary | Application

Podcasts:  Home | What's a Podcast? | Subscribe

No Left Turns Blog  Home | Archive | Postings by Author | Comments by Our Readers | What's in a Name? | RSS Site Feed

Publications:  Home | Editorials | On Principle | Right from the Center | Dialogues | Books | Monographs |
Ashbrook Statesmanship Theses | Res Publica | Publication Request Form | Publications by Subject

Events:  Home | John M. Ashbrook Memorial Dinner | Major Issues Lecture Series | Colloquium |
Van Meter Scholarship Luncheon | Conferences and Special Events | Calendar of Events | On-Line Speeches (RealAudio)

About Us:  Home | Board of Advisors | Staff | Who Was John M. Ashbrook | Support the Ashbrook Center |
Map and Directions

 

The Ashbrook Center is a townhall.com Member Organization.

Verizon Foundation
Support for ashbrook.org is provided by the Verizon Foundation.


John M. Ashbrook Center for Public Affairs
Ashland University
401 College Avenue | Ashland, Ohio 44805
(419) 289-5411  |   (877) 289-5411 (Toll Free)